Five years ago, I read in the Toronto Starissue of July 3, 1990 an article
titled Islam is not Alone in Patriarchal Doctrines, by Gwynne Dyer. The
article described the furious reactions of the participants of a conference on
women and power held in Montrealto the comments of the famous
Egyptian feminist Dr. Nawal Saadawi. Her politically incorrect statements
included : "the most restrictive elements towards women can be found first
in Judaism in the Old Testament thenin Christianity and then in the
Quran" "all religions are patriarchal because they stem from patriarchal
societies" and "veiling of women is not a specifically Islamic practice but
an ancient cultural heritage withanalogies in sister religions". The
participants could not bear sitting around while their faiths were being
equated with Islam. Thus, Dr. Saadawi received a barrage of criticism.
"Dr. Saadawi's comments are unacceptable. Her answers reveal a lack of
understanding about other people's faiths," declared Bernice Dubois of the
World Movement of Mothers. "I must protest", said panellist Alice Shalvi
of Israel women's network, "there is no conception of the veil in Judaism."
The article attributed these furious protests to the strong tendency in the
West to scapegoat Islam for practices that are just as much a part of the
West's own cultural heritage. "Christian and Jewish feminists were not
going to sit around being discussed in the same category as those wicked
Muslims," wrote Gwynne Dyer.
I was not surprised that the conference participants had held such a
negative view of Islam, especially when women's issues were involved. In
the West, Islam is believed to be the symbol of the subordination of
women par excellence. In order to understand how firm this belief is, it is
enough to mention that the Minister of Education in France, the land of
Voltaire, has recently ordered the expulsion of all young Muslim women
wearing the veil from French schools!
1
A young Muslim student wearing a
headscarf is denied her right of education in France, while a Catholic
student wearing a cross or a Jewish student wearing a skullcap is not. The
scene of French policemen preventing young Muslim women wearing
headscarves from entering their high schoolis unforgettable. It inspires the
memories of another equally disgraceful scene of Governor George
Wallace of Alabama in 1962 standing in front of a school gate trying to
block the entrance of black students inorder to prevent the desegregation
2
of Alabama's schools. The difference between the two scenes is that the
black students had the sympathy of so many people in the U.S. and in the
whole world.
President Kennedy sent the U.S. National Guard to force the entry of the
black students. The Muslim girls, on the other hand, received no help from
any one. Their cause seems to have very little sympathy either inside or
outside France. The reason is the widespread misunderstanding and fear of
anything Islamic in the world today.
What intrigued me the most about the Montreal conference was one
question: Were the statements made by Saadawi, or any of her critics,
factual? In other words, do Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have the same
conception of women? Are they different in their conceptions? Do Judaism
and Christianity, truly, offer women a better treatment than Islam does?
What is the Truth?
It is not easy to search for and find answers to these difficult questions.
The first difficulty is that one has to be fair and objective or, at least, do
one's utmost to be so. This is what Islam teaches. The Quran has instructed
Muslims to say the truth even if those who are very close to them do not
like it: Whenever you speak, speak justly, even if a near relative is
concerned (Quran 6:152); O you who believe stand out firmly for justice,
as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents or your
kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor (Quran 4:135).
The other great difficulty is the overwhelming breadth of the subject.
Therefore, during the last few years,I have spent many hours reading the
Bible, The Encyclopaedia of Religion, and the Encyclopaedia Judaica
searching for answers. I have alsoread several books discussing the
position of women in different religions written by scholars, apologists,
and critics. The material presented in the following chapters represents the
important findings of this humble research. I don't claim to be absolutely
objective. This is beyond my limited capacity. All I can say is that I have
been trying, throughout this research, to approach the Quranic ideal of
speaking justly.
I would like to emphasize in this introduction that my purpose for this
study is not to denigrate Judaism or Christianity.
titled Islam is not Alone in Patriarchal Doctrines, by Gwynne Dyer. The
article described the furious reactions of the participants of a conference on
women and power held in Montrealto the comments of the famous
Egyptian feminist Dr. Nawal Saadawi. Her politically incorrect statements
included : "the most restrictive elements towards women can be found first
in Judaism in the Old Testament thenin Christianity and then in the
Quran" "all religions are patriarchal because they stem from patriarchal
societies" and "veiling of women is not a specifically Islamic practice but
an ancient cultural heritage withanalogies in sister religions". The
participants could not bear sitting around while their faiths were being
equated with Islam. Thus, Dr. Saadawi received a barrage of criticism.
"Dr. Saadawi's comments are unacceptable. Her answers reveal a lack of
understanding about other people's faiths," declared Bernice Dubois of the
World Movement of Mothers. "I must protest", said panellist Alice Shalvi
of Israel women's network, "there is no conception of the veil in Judaism."
The article attributed these furious protests to the strong tendency in the
West to scapegoat Islam for practices that are just as much a part of the
West's own cultural heritage. "Christian and Jewish feminists were not
going to sit around being discussed in the same category as those wicked
Muslims," wrote Gwynne Dyer.
I was not surprised that the conference participants had held such a
negative view of Islam, especially when women's issues were involved. In
the West, Islam is believed to be the symbol of the subordination of
women par excellence. In order to understand how firm this belief is, it is
enough to mention that the Minister of Education in France, the land of
Voltaire, has recently ordered the expulsion of all young Muslim women
wearing the veil from French schools!
1
A young Muslim student wearing a
headscarf is denied her right of education in France, while a Catholic
student wearing a cross or a Jewish student wearing a skullcap is not. The
scene of French policemen preventing young Muslim women wearing
headscarves from entering their high schoolis unforgettable. It inspires the
memories of another equally disgraceful scene of Governor George
Wallace of Alabama in 1962 standing in front of a school gate trying to
block the entrance of black students inorder to prevent the desegregation
2
of Alabama's schools. The difference between the two scenes is that the
black students had the sympathy of so many people in the U.S. and in the
whole world.
President Kennedy sent the U.S. National Guard to force the entry of the
black students. The Muslim girls, on the other hand, received no help from
any one. Their cause seems to have very little sympathy either inside or
outside France. The reason is the widespread misunderstanding and fear of
anything Islamic in the world today.
What intrigued me the most about the Montreal conference was one
question: Were the statements made by Saadawi, or any of her critics,
factual? In other words, do Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have the same
conception of women? Are they different in their conceptions? Do Judaism
and Christianity, truly, offer women a better treatment than Islam does?
What is the Truth?
It is not easy to search for and find answers to these difficult questions.
The first difficulty is that one has to be fair and objective or, at least, do
one's utmost to be so. This is what Islam teaches. The Quran has instructed
Muslims to say the truth even if those who are very close to them do not
like it: Whenever you speak, speak justly, even if a near relative is
concerned (Quran 6:152); O you who believe stand out firmly for justice,
as witnesses to Allah, even as against yourselves, or your parents or your
kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor (Quran 4:135).
The other great difficulty is the overwhelming breadth of the subject.
Therefore, during the last few years,I have spent many hours reading the
Bible, The Encyclopaedia of Religion, and the Encyclopaedia Judaica
searching for answers. I have alsoread several books discussing the
position of women in different religions written by scholars, apologists,
and critics. The material presented in the following chapters represents the
important findings of this humble research. I don't claim to be absolutely
objective. This is beyond my limited capacity. All I can say is that I have
been trying, throughout this research, to approach the Quranic ideal of
speaking justly.
I would like to emphasize in this introduction that my purpose for this
study is not to denigrate Judaism or Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment